[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.That network currently provides training throughnational centres of excellence located in Ireland and France.Each national centre isfounded on a partnership among representatives of law enforcement, industry andacademia, which collaborate to develop relevant training programmes and tools for usein the fight against cybercrime (see section IV.G).428.Public-private partnerships specifically targeting terrorist use of the Internet couldalso provide a means to promote clear guidelines regarding information-sharing between198Written submission of expert from Indonesia.199Unofficial forum of the heads of the following industrialized countries: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States.200A/61/606-S/2006/936, annex.131 THE USE OF THE INTERNET FOR TERRORIST PURPOSESthe private and public sector, consistent with applicable data protection regulations.Agood basis for information-sharing guidelines is provided by the Council of Europe Guidelines for the cooperation between law enforcement and Internet service providersagainst cybercrime .201 The focus of these guidelines is the establishment of relationshipsof mutual trust and cooperation between public and private sector stakeholders as afoundation for cooperation.The guidelines also emphasize the need to promote efficientand cost-effective cooperation procedures.Law enforcement authorities and Internetservice providers are encouraged to engage in information exchange to strengthen theircapacity to identify and combat cybercrime through regular meetings and the sharingof good practices and feedback.The guidelines also encourage the establishment offormal partnerships and written procedures as a basis for longer-term relationships, toensure, inter alia, that appropriate protections are provided that the partnership willnot infringe upon the legal rights of industry participants or the legal powers of lawenforcement authorities.202429.Recommended measures to be taken by law enforcement authorities pursuant tothe guidelines include:" Engaging in broad strategic cooperation with ISPs, including by conductingregular technical and legal training seminars, as well as providing feedback oninvestigations conducted or intelligence gathered, based on ISP-initiated reports/complaints" Providing explanations and assistance to ISPs regarding investigation techniquesnot directly related to the case at hand, in order to facilitate an understandingof how ISP cooperation will result in more efficient investigations" Prioritizing requests for large volumes of data while avoiding unnecessary costand disruption of business operations.203430.Recommended measures to be taken by Internet Service providers pursuant tothe guidelines include:" Cooperating to minimize the use of services for illegal purposes" Reporting criminal activity to law enforcement authorities" When possible, providing a list, upon request, of which types of data could bemade available for each service to law enforcement, upon receipt of a validdisclosure request.204431.Public-private partnerships may also provide a forum to promote minimumstandards for the secure retention of data by private sector stakeholders and enhancethe channels of communication for the provision of information by private sector stake-holders regarding suspicious activities.201Council of Europe, Economic Crime Division, Guidelines for the cooperation between law enforcement andInternet service providers against cybercrime (Strasbourg, 2 April 2008).Available from www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/Reports-Presentations/567_prov-d-guidelines_provisional2_3April2008_en.pdf.202Ibid., paras.10-13.203Ibid., paras.17, 29, 30 and 33.204132 Ibid., paras.41, 42 and 50. VIII.ConclusionVIII.A.Use of the Internet for terrorist purposes432.The introductory chapters of the present document provided an overview, devel-oped along functional lines, of the means by which the Internet is often utilized topromote and support acts of terrorism, in particular with respect to propaganda (includ-ing for the purposes of recruitment, radicalization and incitement to terrorism), trainingand financing, planning and executing such acts.Emphasis is also placed on the oppor-tunities offered by the Internet to prevent, detect and deter acts of terrorism [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
zanotowane.pl doc.pisz.pl pdf.pisz.pl matkasanepid.xlx.pl
.That network currently provides training throughnational centres of excellence located in Ireland and France.Each national centre isfounded on a partnership among representatives of law enforcement, industry andacademia, which collaborate to develop relevant training programmes and tools for usein the fight against cybercrime (see section IV.G).428.Public-private partnerships specifically targeting terrorist use of the Internet couldalso provide a means to promote clear guidelines regarding information-sharing between198Written submission of expert from Indonesia.199Unofficial forum of the heads of the following industrialized countries: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States.200A/61/606-S/2006/936, annex.131 THE USE OF THE INTERNET FOR TERRORIST PURPOSESthe private and public sector, consistent with applicable data protection regulations.Agood basis for information-sharing guidelines is provided by the Council of Europe Guidelines for the cooperation between law enforcement and Internet service providersagainst cybercrime .201 The focus of these guidelines is the establishment of relationshipsof mutual trust and cooperation between public and private sector stakeholders as afoundation for cooperation.The guidelines also emphasize the need to promote efficientand cost-effective cooperation procedures.Law enforcement authorities and Internetservice providers are encouraged to engage in information exchange to strengthen theircapacity to identify and combat cybercrime through regular meetings and the sharingof good practices and feedback.The guidelines also encourage the establishment offormal partnerships and written procedures as a basis for longer-term relationships, toensure, inter alia, that appropriate protections are provided that the partnership willnot infringe upon the legal rights of industry participants or the legal powers of lawenforcement authorities.202429.Recommended measures to be taken by law enforcement authorities pursuant tothe guidelines include:" Engaging in broad strategic cooperation with ISPs, including by conductingregular technical and legal training seminars, as well as providing feedback oninvestigations conducted or intelligence gathered, based on ISP-initiated reports/complaints" Providing explanations and assistance to ISPs regarding investigation techniquesnot directly related to the case at hand, in order to facilitate an understandingof how ISP cooperation will result in more efficient investigations" Prioritizing requests for large volumes of data while avoiding unnecessary costand disruption of business operations.203430.Recommended measures to be taken by Internet Service providers pursuant tothe guidelines include:" Cooperating to minimize the use of services for illegal purposes" Reporting criminal activity to law enforcement authorities" When possible, providing a list, upon request, of which types of data could bemade available for each service to law enforcement, upon receipt of a validdisclosure request.204431.Public-private partnerships may also provide a forum to promote minimumstandards for the secure retention of data by private sector stakeholders and enhancethe channels of communication for the provision of information by private sector stake-holders regarding suspicious activities.201Council of Europe, Economic Crime Division, Guidelines for the cooperation between law enforcement andInternet service providers against cybercrime (Strasbourg, 2 April 2008).Available from www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/Reports-Presentations/567_prov-d-guidelines_provisional2_3April2008_en.pdf.202Ibid., paras.10-13.203Ibid., paras.17, 29, 30 and 33.204132 Ibid., paras.41, 42 and 50. VIII.ConclusionVIII.A.Use of the Internet for terrorist purposes432.The introductory chapters of the present document provided an overview, devel-oped along functional lines, of the means by which the Internet is often utilized topromote and support acts of terrorism, in particular with respect to propaganda (includ-ing for the purposes of recruitment, radicalization and incitement to terrorism), trainingand financing, planning and executing such acts.Emphasis is also placed on the oppor-tunities offered by the Internet to prevent, detect and deter acts of terrorism [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]